[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4287: ob_start(): output handler 'ob_gzhandler' conflicts with 'zlib output compression'
Reynold's Final Tribal Council Thread - Stranded in Tuamotus
By Jeff Probst
Custom Posts Custom Custom
#65385
This is Reynold's Final Tribal Council Thread.

All other Jurors should remain in their own threads. Final 3, remember... this is not for you to address each other, but to talk to Reynold. In-fighting amongst the Final 3 should be reserved for the Live Final Tribal Council on Sunday.

Reynold, you have until Saturday at 8c/9e to post your statements/questions to the Final 3. Remember not to take up too much of their time as they have 10 other jurors to get to. Please no listing or questions requiring novels for answers. You should post all of your statements/questions in your opening post in this thread. There is a live Final Council on Sunday where you will get to address everyone live about the statements they have made as well ask follow-ups.
 

Jeff Probst

  • Host
  • Posts: 964
  • Awards: Custom Posts Custom Custom
By Reynold
Posts
#65440
Well I was going to make this a complex line of questioning but I'm just going to prefer to keep it simple tonight:

QUESTIONS TO THE FINAL 3: The same line of questioning for all 3. What was your game defining move? A singular move that nobody else can take credit for, and how did that move get you to the end? This is your platform. Do not lie because this jury has been extremely active and compared notes regardless of what our relationships were in the game.andddddd I'll just throw one more little question in there ---- What made you your own individual, and how did you play this game different than you believe other winners did in the past? What made you, YOU? It's easy to rip off other people's game but I want to know how you managed to create your own game and not just memorize and implement the strategies of what you've studied?I love that gritty, raw, in-the moment game that comes from the heart.


MY STATEMENTS:

SHERRI: I think you've played the most well-rounded game. You played a game with heart, soul, and you kept it GAME. You weren't an unnecessary moaning prick and I appreciate that. You were straight to business, if something didn't work out, then ya picked yourself back up like the bad bitch you are and got what you wanted in the end. I believe that you have really stood out as an individual this game and I have not encountered a player completely like you before. It's a breath of fresh air and I'm glad you were my number one for my very short tenure in the game. #Sheynold to the end baby. You also were at the forefront of everything, I saw that first hand. You always get what you wanted in this game, and I think if you want something bad enough you just have to take it. You did it. Congratulations on making it to the end baby :smile:

MICHAEL: Your game was wonderful but you have a terrible personality. Sherri played a better version of your game and wasn't just a sociopath about it. Plus she won challenges, immunity idols, never at the bottom, a nice person. Obviously being in the front in damn near every vote, obviously she screwed people over yet, they aren't mad at here, that's one hell of a mist. What the hell else does it take to win survivor? She has ticked every mark on the theoretical sheet to win this game, yet you've still acted so cocky like you're "the one". You came across as a prick and you should not have held yourself to that level because you really weren't THAT good. Now you were good, just not THAT good. I do respect your game and you have potential to win, but you probably won't get my vote. I've been telling the jury the best case for you is to shut UP for days , but you're sick and you can't shut the hell up. You get more flies with honey than you do with shit. I think you over-played unnecessary. #bb19paul

MATT: I think you said it all in your opening speech to the jury. So just answer my question regarding your game, please.



:confetti: :confetti: :confetti: :confetti: :confetti: :confetti: :confetti: :confetti: :confetti: :confetti:


Congratulations final 3!
Elizabeth, Allie liked this
 

Reynold

  • Jury
  • Posts: 522
  • Awards: Posts
By Sherri
Posts
#65507
#Sheynold for life baby! :heart: :heart: It's so great to be able to talk to you again, Reynold, and I was really bummed that our time was cut short. Thank you for all your support here. It was definitely a comfort knowing I had you starting off the jury by cheering me on! Would love to catch up over some shrimp and grits but these are a couple of pretty big questions so I think I better get straight into them.

So starting with a game defining move....phew that's a tricky one! I think I made a lot of great moves but a lot of them weren't quite singular. They were done with someone else or in a group and while I helped lead these, you couldn't really count them a 'singular move' on my part. I guess finding those idols was singular but they didn't necessarily help me get to the end and I've already discussed them somewhat.

I'm instead going to go with something a bit more unorthodox in that it's something very small, and a move I repeated often, but still something that helped me get to the end. Something that could quite possibly get me the win too. That move? Forgiveness. Sounds lame as hell, right? Like some stupid buzzword in some run of the mill church service. The thing is, making a conscious effort to forgive people in this game was still important. Important to me personally, important to my social game and important for the people around me.

While it's not a big move like some big blindside or idolling someone out, I think it's still big in the sense that it's not always easy to do. Forgiveness is not easy for everyone but I did not want to dwell on the bad in this game and I didn't want to hold grudges. If people voted out one of my allies or if they voted for me or if they did something different to what they told me...I forgave them. Super quickly, just like that. I hate when things get awkward between players so I just tried to clear things up right away. And like, that really wasn't me being fake or anything. I genuinely just wanted to move on from the past. Forgive and not forget is right, but forgiveness was key and I don't think there were many people in this game who could forgive as easily and naturally as I could.

So how is this game defining exactly? Well it was pretty much the heart of what I think was a really strong social game. I think if I burned bridges with everyone who wasn't on my side 100% then there's no way I would be here. I kept things open, I kept talking to people and this allowed me to form short term alliances with people. It wouldn't be all the way to end but I think people liked me enough and respected my attitude enough to come together and warm to me. The alternative would have been even more people coming after me and I definitely did not want that! Ultimately though, I think the forgiveness and kindness that I showed people was instrumental in my social game. That social game is part of the reason why I'm sitting here so although it may seem insignificant to some, I think that was instrumental in setting up my game and improving my relationship with the jury.

Okay let's break this up with a random Sherri gif...

Image

Onto the next question!

So just a bit of background first but this game was nothing like any other ORG that I've played before. I mean that in so many ways but I think a key way here is regarding the alias. The alias is obviously important to keep anonymity in any game but here, that's where it ends. You don't need to act like your alias, I didn't have to be Sherri, I just needed to be myself. That seems like a pretty easy concept but it's something I'm not used to! Most of the games I've played put such a strong emphasis on the alias. You're in character, you're doing stupid schticks and really playing up the roleplay aspects of the game. You don't share things about your personal life, say where you're from or where you work. Nothing like that, you're just hiding behind a character.

Coming in this game, however, I couldn't hide behind a character. I had to be myself and open up to people and share all this stuff to people who started as strangers. It was real weird and part of me was genuinely worried coming into this. I know I'm good at having fun with a character and making people laugh but now I just had to be me. What if people didn't like me? What if they found me boring or unfunny or annoying? If people don't like a character I'm playing then I can just put that on the character, not on me. But I couldn't do that here and that scared the hell out of me.

So nooooooowww I needed to think about me and what kind of player that Sherri was going to be. I didn't go and research past winners or study strategies, anything like that. I just wanted it to be natural and I just hoped that people would like me and enjoy our conversations. Without knowing what some of the winners were like, I just wanted to bring elements of my real self to the game. I don't consider myself an intense person, I'm just chilled out and easy going and sometimes a little silly. I say stupid things or talk about ridiculous topics but that's just because I enjoy having fun with it.

I actually think something that really encapsulates what I'm all about is my night one strategy. I wasn't exactly sure how I would approach speaking to people for the first time but I thought what's something that brings everyone together? Food. :heart: Not just that, but the exciting concept of having breakfast for dinner opened up a world of conversations with people! Like, this legitimately became my first strategy of the game. Talk to people about how I had french toast for dinner and then have that roll into some fun, light hearted conversations...and I think it worked lmao. I'm hoping that if anything, Sherri's 'French Toast Strategy' will be studied for years to come. Oh and by the way, I'm pretty sure I've had French Toast every Thursday night since this game started??? So I'm pretty sure it's brought me luck.

I think I really am a unique person out here. I was obviously focused in on the game but I was also weird and playful and just enjoying myself to the fullest. I think there's probably some classic winner archetypes like the loveable underdog or the badass stratbot...but I was just Sherri. A silly, free-spirited adventurer who legitimately incorporated food into her strategy. I'm really proud of what I've done here so I hope my legacy is one that people remember fondly, have a smile and a bit of a laugh about.

Thank you, Reynold. :heart:
Alexis, Reynold, Jessica and 1 others liked this
 

Sherri

  • Alumni
  • Posts: 432
  • Awards: Posts
By Matt
Posts
#65788
Hey Reynold, I was helping out with an apartment move yesterday and then volunteering at a vaccine clinic so I wasn't online past the morning PST. I'll respond to your question regardless today.
Reynold liked this
 

Matt

  • Alumni
  • Posts: 315
  • Awards: Posts
By Michael
Posts
#65799
So I was working on a response to this when I got a notification from you.


I'm going to respond anyway, because I had another six hours to make my response.
What made you your own individual, and how did you play this game different than you believe other winners did in the past? What made you, YOU?
Because I used a combination of following my heart and following my head to get to the end. I made a few votes strictly based on emotion and I made a few votes strictly based on what was good gameplay. It's a shame that you didn't get to see more of that from me in our time together. I think I played this game differently because I wasn't afraid to make moves that were to completely benefit my friends and allies if I needed to, and valuing friendship and loyalty over all else. Even playing some "perfect game".

Your game was wonderful but you have a terrible personality.
Image

Plus she won challenges, immunity idols, never at the bottom, a nice person. Obviously being in the front in damn near every vote, obviously she screwed people over yet, they aren't mad at here, that's one hell of a mist.
I'd just like to correct this for you, Sherri was at the bottom for the final two rounds and if she lost either the final five or the final four immunity challenge, she would have been voted out because she didn't have the connections to stay in the game any longer. I also cannot think of a vote that she fronted that went through. Which is totally fine, because she was always doing the right thing and it got her to the end, and she does have a wonderful social game. But voting strategy wasn't her strong point. Sherri is absolutely fab though, and I knew you wouldn't be voting for anyone else.


Take care, Reynold :cool:

I also earned my own Partner Idol. :angel:
Alexis liked this
 

Michael

  • Alumni
  • Posts: 461
  • Awards: Posts
By Matt
Posts
#65825
QUESTIONS TO THE FINAL 3: The same line of questioning for all 3. What was your game defining move? A singular move that nobody else can take credit for, and how did that move get you to the end? This is your platform. Do not lie because this jury has been extremely active and compared notes regardless of what our relationships were in the game.andddddd I'll just throw one more little question in there ---- What made you your own individual, and how did you play this game different than you believe other winners did in the past? What made you, YOU? It's easy to rip off other people's game but I want to know how you managed to create your own game and not just memorize and implement the strategies of what you've studied? I love that gritty, raw, in-the moment game that comes from the heart.

Hi again Reynold. I think the best move I made was finding the merge idol and telling Michael, Sherri, and Stephannie about it, which enabled it to be kept quiet until the F6 round when it had to be played. I found the idol the morning of Liz's boot. Having the idol allowed me and others to move through a tough part of the merge without having to be too too worried about split votes. Whenever somebody was going to be voted out and people were worried that they had the idol (outside of S/S/M) I tried to downplay the concern or shift to something else. I think telling Michael about the idol separately and Sherri and Stephannie about the idol separately also allowed me to gain knowledge from both sides of the game while also trying to keep Hope and Jessica close with our final 3 deal. This allowed me to solidify my position in the center and make adjustments as needed when certain people got voted out or not. My positioning in the middle and my ability to forge connections with multiple people and not run with any one person or people made my game my own, as exhibited in this move.

Sherri has said that she led strategic decisions at the merge. I don't see any evidence of that. Most of the strategic decisions at merge were team efforts (besides for Alexis leading the Allie vote), and using the idol to build my own little team was a move that helped me tremendously. I also don't think Sherri used her idols to the same advantage. If you love gritty, raw, in-the-moment game that comes from the heart, that wasn't displayed when Sherri misplayed the first idol when you could've been saved with it. Sherri had told Hope about the first idol and could've anticipated that the vote would've been off herself if Hope was going to flip away that early in the merge; though Hope was hard to predict and came after me later for having an idol, that early in the merge it would've been messy and I don't think she would've done that. In addition, Sherri didn't use her second idol to extend beyond the core group which meant that she was limiting her options. This trajectory carried forth to the end of the game, where Sherri won immunity twice at F5 and F4 and still could not control the vote.
Hope, Reynold liked this
 

Matt

  • Alumni
  • Posts: 315
  • Awards: Posts